Features built for serious content operations
From AI detection to API automation, the platform is designed to help teams publish confidently while protecting brand trust and search performance. Use the tabs below to explore each capability in depth.
Each card opens the matching tool or page in a new context—click anywhere on the card.
AI probability engine
Sentence-level signals so reviewers know where prose looks statistically model-like—not just a single headline score.
Open AI checkerPlagiarism signal checks
Surface overlap risk before publication when research pulls from many URLs or recycled briefs.
Open plagiarism checkerReadability optimization
Tune complexity for audience, funnel stage, and snippet-friendly clarity.
Open readability toolGrammar & style QA
Catch usage and clarity issues in pre-publish workflows without slowing writers down.
Open grammar checkerFact risk indicators
Highlight claims that need manual verification—especially for YMYL and client-facing copy.
Open fact checkREST API access
Wire checks into CMS, mobile apps, and agency pipelines with predictable JSON responses.
View pricingStart with a free scan on the AI content detector, then explore plagiarism and readability tools when originality and clarity matter for the same draft.
Trust signals that hold up under scrutiny
Editors and compliance leads need more than vibes. AI likelihood helps you prioritize which paragraphs deserve a closer read—especially when voice suddenly goes flat or claims appear without sourcing. Plagiarism-style checks complement that by addressing a different question: whether language overlaps suspiciously with known sources or prior drafts.
Use both together for cornerstone pages, student assessments, and client deliverables where originality and authenticity are part of the contract. Run the free AI checker first, then route high-risk work through your institutional or agency QA checklist.
- Heat-map style review instead of pass/fail theater
- Clearer handoffs between legal, SEO, and editorial
- Repeatable language for clients about what tools can and cannot prove
Editorial QA that matches how teams actually ship
Readability and grammar passes catch different failure modes than AI detection: unclear instructions, jargon walls, and tone drift. Fact-style checks flag statements that need a second source before you put a brand name next to a bold claim.
Stack these checks after structure is sound—otherwise you polish prose that still answers the wrong question. For SEO hubs, pair editorial QA with internal linking and on-page intent review; see our blog & guides for workflows that sit alongside tooling.
API-first when volume and SLAs matter
Agencies and product teams often need the same checks in three places: the browser for spot QA, the dashboard for reviewers, and the API for automated pipelines. Consistent scoring and predictable payloads make it easier to log what ran, when, and on which version of a draft.
If you are evaluating vendors, ask about rate limits, data retention, and how errors surface to your workers. Good documentation and honest limits usually beat vague “enterprise ready” labels.
View pricing